Independent Canine Staff Enrichment Audit

May 2026 · Official Staff Enrichment Records

Complete May 2026 Audit

Review the Full Findings, Methodology, and Recommendations

The complete report includes the detailed analysis, audit scope, data-quality observations, shelter medicine guidance, and recommendations presented to Gwinnett County leadership.

Download Full Audit Report
PDF • 14 Pages

What the Audit Found

Using official May 2026 shelter records, this independent audit reconciled the population of 415 dogs, verified shelter exits and shelter care-days, and analyzed all 212 documented staff enrichment activities. The findings below highlight the most significant patterns identified during the review.

4.3%

Systemic Daily Deficit

Only 4.3% of shelter care-days included documented enrichment. Statistically, a dog housed in the Gwinnett shelter on any given day had a 95.7% chance of receiving no documented enrichment.

78.8%

No Documented Enrichment

327 of 415 dogs had no documented staff enrichment recorded during May 2026.

62%+

Single Point of Failure

More than 62% of all documented enrichment in May was recorded by a single employee, highlighting a severe operational bottleneck and dependency on one staff member.

Enrichment by Length of Stay

The audit examined all 415 dogs based on the total number of days they were physically housed in the shelter during May 2026.

2–13 Days Early Confinement
199 of 216 dogs 92.1%

received zero
documented enrichment.

14–29 Days Longer Stay
40 of 68 dogs 58.8%

received zero
documented enrichment.

30+ Days Longest Stay
25 of 63 dogs 39.7%

received zero
documented enrichment.

Why This Matters

Recognized shelter medicine guidance identifies regular physical activity, mental stimulation, and positive human interaction as essential components of behavioral health during confinement. Enrichment is not optional—it helps reduce stress, frustration, and behavioral deterioration.

Shelter leadership has frequently cited behavioral decline as a primary factor in euthanasia decisions. If documented enrichment was absent for the vast majority of shelter care-days, are dogs receiving the behavioral support necessary to prevent the very decline later cited as justification for euthanasia?

Documentation Quality

Forensic reconciliation identified recurring data-quality issues that significantly complicated independent verification and limited effective administrative oversight.

Incorrect Animal IDs

Some enrichment pages were created using incorrect Animal IDs, requiring manual review to determine the correct record.

Blank or Incomplete Entries

Some pages listed dogs but contained no initials, activity, date, or confirmation that enrichment occurred.

Inconsistent Documentation

Staff used different abbreviations, symbols, date formats, and levels of detail across the records.

Duplicate or Legacy Forms

Duplicate records and older forms required additional reconciliation before the data could be analyzed.

What Needs to Change

The audit identified practical opportunities to strengthen behavioral care, documentation, performance measurement, and accountability.

Make Enrichment a Measurable Standard
  • Track documented enrichment daily by individual dog.
  • Establish expectations for frequency and consistency.
  • Review performance through routine quality assurance.
  • Measure care over the entire shelter stay—not only total activity counts.
Distribute Responsibility Across Staff
  • Build a team-based enrichment model.
  • Define staff responsibilities clearly.
  • Avoid operational dependency on one employee.
  • Include trained volunteers where appropriate.
Prioritize Dogs Most at Risk
  • Identify dogs approaching extended confinement.
  • Flag dogs with no enrichment documented in recent days.
  • Create enhanced plans for long-stay dogs.
  • Prioritize enrichment based on individual behavioral needs.
Improve Documentation and Transparency
  • Replace handwritten logs with a structured digital system.
  • Capture the dog, date, activity, and staff or volunteer involved.
  • Standardize terminology and documentation requirements.
  • Publish meaningful enrichment performance metrics.

Supporting Documents & Data

Review the workbook, methodology materials, data tables, and official source records used in the audit.

Better Enrichment. Healthier Dogs. Greater Accountability.

Gwinnett County has an opportunity to use meaningful documentation, measurable standards, and evidence-based behavioral care to improve outcomes for dogs in the shelter.

Contact County Leadership